LogoVersion2

Forum

03/19/2012 12:59pm  New model designation  Rob Sarberenyi

Stan or Zack,

Could you please create a new model designation under BLC (Boise Locomotive Co.) for SD40M-3? FWIW, there's already a BLC SD40TM-3.

HLCX 6522, currently listed as a MK SD40M-2, should appear under a BLC SD40M-3 designation instead
http://www.locophotos.com/PhotoDetails.php?PhotoID=123382

Thanks!

Reply To This Post


03/19/2012 1:53pm  RE: New model designation  Bill Miller

Is MK SD40M-2 not accurate for when it was rebuilt ?

Reply To This Post


03/19/2012 2:14pm  RE: New model designation  Rob Sarberenyi

Nope! The locomotive manufacturing part became Boise Locomotive Company in 1996 -- see MPI's company history
http://www.motivepower-wabtec.com/about/history.php

BLC then became MPI in 1999. Confusing, I know, but that's what it is.

Since the particular unit in question here, HLCX 6522, was rebuilt in 1997 to Dash 3 standards (microprocessor controls), IMHO, it really should be listed as a BLC SD40M-3.

Like some folks, I don't particularly enjoy this business of rebuilding and redesignating locomotive models (Dash 3 etc.), it often gets rather confusing, but to be historically accurate, it's now become something of a necessary evil.

There are a lots of units listed on LocoPhotos as "EMD SD40-3". It'll take a while, but I'd sure like to get them cleaned out, then *ultimately* have SD40-3 removed from appearing under the EMD model designation. Same with SD40M-2 and others which aren't *true* EMD model names.

Reply To This Post


03/19/2012 5:31pm  RE: New model designation  Bill Miller

I typically cross reference everything with an "original model" (ORMOD) field in my slide file -> http://hostovsky.com/~WDM/sample.jpg .

This allows me to bring everything up in a group and correct it en masse weeding out inconsistencies.

Reply To This Post


03/20/2012 12:07am  RE: New model designation  Stan Lytle

Fixed.

Stan

Reply To This Post

© 2007-2013 Stan Lytle All rights reserved Terms Of Use